USPTO serial 76711941
MANIK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 11, 2014
- Examiner
- KEATING, MICHAEL P
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with MANIK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Zapopan, Jalisco, MX
Zapopan, Jalisco, MX
Zapopan, Jalisco, MX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric Ricardo Gallo Flores
Eric Ricardo Gallo Flores Gallo Music LawTulipan Sur D29Zapopan, 45238MEXICOGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | AGAVE NECTAR AND AGAVE SYRUP | ACTIVE | Feb 12, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2025 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2025 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 11, 2025 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 11, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 23, 2024 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2019 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2019 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 4, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 11, 2019 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 7, 2014 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2014 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 1, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2014 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2014 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 25, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | PGSU | PETITION GRANTED - SOU FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2014 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2014 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jun 13, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 29, 2014 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2014 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 28, 2014 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 31, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 27, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2013 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 2, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 12, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 29, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 28, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 25, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 17, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 28, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 27, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 10, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 15, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |