USPTO serial 76712734
BRIGHT MOVES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BRIGHT MOVES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas B. Haverstock
THOMAS B. HAVERSTOCK HAVERSTOCK & OWENS LLP162 N WOLFE RDSUNNYVALE, CA 94086-5211UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer game software for use in playing multi-player games, interactive games, action games, dancing games, skill games, exercising games, physical therapy games; computer game software for use with playing games with electronic controllers; downloadable electronic games via the internet; interactive video game programs | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Electronic game controllers for computer games; hands-free electronic controllers and non-contact electronic game controllers for computer games; Interactive tools, namely, game controllers to control elements in computer software for use in playing multi-player games, interactive games, action games, dancing games, skill games, exercising games, physical therapy games; hands-free controllers and non-contact controllers for computer games | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for use in playing multi-player games, interactive games, action games, dancing games, skill games, exercising games, physical therapy games and for use in detecting and tracking objects to control interactive elements | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Capper, David G.
- Other trademarks owned by Capper, David G.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BRIGHT MOVES
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 9, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 21, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2016 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2016 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 20, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2015 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 2, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2015 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 29, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 22, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 2, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 4, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 3, 2013 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 8, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 18, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 5, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 9, 2013 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Aug 5, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 29, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 29, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 26, 2013 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | PBTQ | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB OTQR REQUEST | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 21, 2013 | RDX2 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2013 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 29, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 18, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |