USPTO serial 76712795
C.A.T.S.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CALLAGHAN, BRIAN P
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with C.A.T.S.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Terry L. McCutcheon
TERRY L. MCCUTCHEON The Matthews Firm2000 BERING DR STE 700HOUSTON, TX 77057-3776UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Complete Automated Technology System oil and gas equipment, namely, well drilling machines, drilling rigs, completion rigs, snubbing rigs, top drives, downhole motors and downhole drilling tools in the nature of drill pipe tubulars, landing strings, completion tubulars, and bottom hole tools, namely, drill string stabilizers, drill collars, hole openers and downhole drill bits for use in conducting well drilling services, namely, drilling of oil, gas, and water wells, equipment for performing well cementing services, namely, power-operated pumps for providing cement and powered operated hands-free pumps, equipment for performing completion services, namely, completion rigs, sidetracking equipment, namely, whipstocks and mills, automated snubbing units, automated tongs, automated pipe handling equipment for the assembly of downhole tubulars, equipment required to enable production from a well, namely, rigs, oil, gas and water well pumping machines, hands-free torque turning tongs, automated blow out preventer/well control stacks, and power operated pumps, equipment for perforating of wells, namely, high-pressure pumps, and equipment for stimulating of wells, namely, automated snubbing units, and well improvement equipment in the nature of hydraulic fracturing machines including high-pressure pumps used to stimulate oil and gas production; Complete Automated Technology System oil and gas equipment, namely, rigs, and oil, gas and water well pumping and pipe reciprocating machines for conducting production services, namely, pumping and extracting of oil, gas, and water from a well; equipment for performing snubbing of wells, namely, automated snubbing units, hydraulically actuated snubbing jacks, and equipment for conducting workover of wells, namely, workover rigs and completion rigs | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2012 |
| 009 | Hands-free blow out preventer control system comprised of electromechanical controls, namely, electrical sensors, position sensors, pressure sensors, temperature sensors, cables, wireless transmitters and wireless receivers, all of which are adapted for positioning in and on a blow out preventer and blow out preventer control facilities for sensing, tranmitting and receiving physical properties of the blow out preventer | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2014 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| May 12, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 28, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 26, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 25, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |