USPTO serial 76714531
SODABURST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PARKS, KIMBERLY L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SODABURST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Delray Beach, FL
Delray Beach, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard D. Harris
RICHARD D. HARRIS GREENBERG TRAURIG, P.C.77 W WACKER DR STE 3100CHICAGO, IL 60601-4904UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Concentrated syrups and powders for use in the preparation of carbonated soft drinks and uncarbonated beverages in the nature of energy drinks, sports drinks, and flavored fruit, sports and soft drink beverages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 28, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 1, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 2, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2014 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 1, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 11, 2014 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 24, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 22, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 21, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 25, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 30, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |