USPTO serial 76714713
MULTIMASKING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIDWELL WALKER, JACLYN NOEMI
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MULTIMASKING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Yasuo Muramatsu
YASUO MURAMATSU MURAMATSU & ASSOCIATES26471 Rancho Parkway South Suite BLake Forest, CA 92630UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Creams, namely, cleansing creams, cold creams, foundation creams, hand creams, non-medicated sunburn creams for the prevention and treatment of sunburn, eye creams, lip creams; Skin care and bath products, namely, sun block lotions and sprays, sunscreen lotions and sprays, self-tanning lotions and sprays, moisturizing lotions and sprays, after-sun lotions and sprays, body mask lotions and sprays, skin lotions and sprays, non-medicated skin care preparations for minimizing the appearance of pores including making pores less visible and less shiny, hair lotions and sprays, facial lotions and sprays, body lotions and sprays, moisturizers and toners, tinted moisturizers, after-bath lotions and sprays, cosmetic masks, body masks, skin masks, skin moisturizer masks, facial masks, beauty masks, facial beauty masks, non-medicated facial strips for removing clogs from pores on the skin, non-medical facial cleaning strips containing adhesives for peeling away the dirt and oil from the skin | ACTIVE | Sep 2, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 16, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 18, 2016 | RDX2 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2016 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2016 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2016 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2016 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 8, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 8, 2016 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 9, 2016 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2016 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 14, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2015 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 2015 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 25, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 14, 2015 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 9, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 2, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 16, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2014 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 22, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 2, 2014 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 27, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2013 | FFDM | FILING RECEIPT CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 26, 2013 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |