Drawing for PERFECT PILLOW PICKER

USPTO serial 76715019

PERFECT PILLOW PICKER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GLASSER, CARYN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PERFECT PILLOW PICKER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kirk Teska

KIRK TESKA IANDIORIO TESKA & COLEMAN LLP255 BEAR HILL RDWALTHAM, MA 02451-1017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Providing an interactive catalog website for assisting customers in making a purchasing decision in the field of pillowsABANDONEDJul 26, 2011

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 2, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 23, 2014MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jun 23, 2014ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jun 23, 2014OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jun 23, 2014OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
May 13, 2014OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 8, 2014OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 8, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 19, 2014NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 5, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 3, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 12, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 11, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 11, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 9, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 12, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 8, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance