Drawing for PRE-SHOT ANALYTICS

USPTO serial 76715149

PRE-SHOT ANALYTICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRE-SHOT ANALYTICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew C. Cox

Matthew C. Cox Waller Lansden Dortch & Davis, LLP511 Union StreetSuite 2700Nashville, TN 37219

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009firearm training devices, namely, a firearm simulator to train firearm users to improve trigger pull techniqueACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 5, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 4, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 29, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Feb 3, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Feb 2, 2017EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Jan 30, 2017EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Jan 30, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 30, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jul 29, 2016EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Jul 22, 2016EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Jul 22, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 16, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Dec 15, 2015EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Dec 10, 2015EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Dec 10, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 28, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jul 25, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jul 22, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jul 22, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 6, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 6, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Feb 19, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED
Feb 18, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Feb 17, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Dec 26, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Dec 26, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 29, 2014NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 18, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Jun 3, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 14, 2014NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 1, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Apr 30, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 30, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 30, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Apr 30, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Mar 10, 2014ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Mar 10, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 3, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 24, 2014MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 5, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 28, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 22, 2013MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Oct 18, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance