USPTO serial 76715292
THE FLYING CLASSROOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE FLYING CLASSROOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marlon A. Hill
MARLON A. HILL DELANCYHILL, P.A.9100 S DADELAND BLVD FL 15MIAMI, FL 33156-7814UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational services, namely, providing online classes via a virtual classroom in the fields of aviation, aeronautical sciences, science, computer sciences, technology, engineering, and mathematics, history, social studies, and geography and providing curricula in connection therewith; educational services, namely, conducting on-line exhibitions and displays and interactive exhibits in the fields of aviation, aeronautical sciences, science, computer sciences, technology, engineering, and mathematics, history, social studies, and geography; educational services, namely, developing curriculum for other in the fields of aviation,aeronautical sciences, science, computer sciences, technology, engineering, and mathematics, history, social studies, and geography | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 23, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 19, 2014 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 24, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 4, 2014 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 20, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 17, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 30, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 14, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 26, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |