USPTO serial 76715407
ODD DUCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUSH, KAREN K
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ODD DUCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Monroe, LA
West Monroe, LA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rachel Blue
Rachel Blue McAfee & Taft1717 S. BoulderSuite 900Tulsa, OK 74119Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Perfumes; Colognes; Health and Beauty Aids, namely, Cosmetics and Hair care Preparations; Kits and cases sold containing health and beauty aids, namely, containing shampoo, hair conditioner, cosmetics, hand and body creams, and perfume | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | Jewelry, namely, costume jewelry, rings, bracelets, necklaces, brooches, clocks, jewelry boxes; watch buckles | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Coffee cups and mugs | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, Jeans, graphic t-shirts, shirts, shorts, swimwear, sportswear in the nature of jackets and ties; Footwear; Headwear, namely, hats, caps, bandanas; Cold weather wear, namely, coats, jackets and legwarmers; Accessories, namely, Cold weather wear accessories in the nature of mittens and woolen hats, socks, belts, gloves, scarves | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | Pony tail holders; belt buckles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by River Rock, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by River Rock, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Similar marks named ODD DUCK
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 11, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 2, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 2, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 9, 2014 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 14, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 24, 2014 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 25, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 12, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 8, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |