USPTO serial 76715410
JEP ROBERTSON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUSH, KAREN K
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JEP ROBERTSON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Monroe, LA
West Monroe, LA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rachel Blue
Rachel Blue McAfee & Taft1717 S. BoulderSuite 900Tulsa, OK 74119Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Perfumes; Colognes; Health and Beauty Aids, namely, Cosmetics and Hair care Preparations; Kits and cases sold containing health and beauty aids, namely, containing shampoo, hair conditioner, cosmetics, hand and body creams, and perfume | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Eyewear; Sunglasses; Sunglass chains and cords; Sunglass cases | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | Jewelry, namely, bracelets, chains, necklaces, arm cuffs, earrings, rings, belt chains, watches, charms, pins, jewelry, and jewelry boxes; watch buckles | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Handbags, purses and wallets; Tote bags; Luggage; Trunks; Backpacks; wallet chains | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Coffee cups and mugs | ACTIVE | — |
| 022 | Lanyards for sunglasses | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, Jeans, graphic tees, shirts, shorts, swimwear, Footwear; Headwear, namely, hats, caps, bandanas, socks, belts, gloves, scarves | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | Hair accessories and ornaments, namely, ties, scrunchies, twisters, snap clips, hair sticks, ribbons, bands, barrettes, bows, ponytail holders and ribbons, ornamental hair combs, ornamental hair pins; belt buckles | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Sporting goods, namely, hunting game calls; Sporting goods, namely, animal hunting decoys; Action figures; Plush toys; Dolls | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Tea and tea based beverages and Iced Teas; Coffee and coffee based beverages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by River Rock, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by River Rock, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 022
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named JEP ROBERTSON
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 17, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 17, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 15, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 21, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 2, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 2, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2015 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 18, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 18, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 6, 2014 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 6, 2014 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 6, 2014 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 21, 2014 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 6, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 6, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 17, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 12, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 28, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 8, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |