USPTO serial 76715521
ADVANTAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KELLY, JOHN M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ADVANTAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary H. Powell
MARY H. POWELL POWELL LAW, PCPO BOX 61485HARRISBURG, PA 17106-1485UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Wooden furniture molding, namely, wooden furniture moldings for cabinets and wooden furniture moldings for cabinet doors; wooden finishing items, namely, wooden door knobs for furniture cabinets; wooden furniture cabinet finishing items, namely, furniture cabinet door knob inserts in the nature of non-metal door fittings; wooden cabinet parts, namely, wood cabinet door frames, wood cabinet door panels, wood cabinet door stiles, and wood cabinet door rails; wooden accessories in the nature of furniture parts for cabinets, namely, furring strips, dado pegs, dowel rods, and edge banding | ACTIVE | Sep 20, 2011 |
| 037 | REPAIR, MAINTENANCE AND FINISHING OF CABINETRY AND CABINET PARTS | ACTIVE | Sep 20, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2017 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2016 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 2, 2016 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2016 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 2, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 5, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 4, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 30, 2015 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 23, 2014 | CEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 22, 2014 | EPEN | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 10, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 20, 2013 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |