USPTO serial 76715777
ECO-CLEAN SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, JULIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ECO-CLEAN SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James W. Hiney
PO BOX 818MIDDLEBURG, VA 20118-0818UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | family of cleaning products including ECOZYME ENZYMATIC and ECOBASE DETERGENT as well as ECO-BIO FOAM, a surgical instrument cleaner detergent, ECO-SONIC INSTRUMENT DETERGENT, an advanced surfactant cleaner designed to refurbish surgical instrumentation without hazardous ingredients, ECO-CLEAN DETERGENT DISINFECTANT, a fast and effective non-alcohol formulation making product compatible with all materials, and ECO-SCOPE PLUS DETERGENT a high level disinfectant for reprocessing of semicritical medical devices for which sterilization is not suitable | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 18, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 1, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |