USPTO serial 76716070
E-Z OPEN CONDIMENT PACKET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with E-Z OPEN CONDIMENT PACKET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Huntington Beach, CA
Huntington Beach, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Honey, sauces, namely, tartar sauce, jalapeno hot sauce, sweet and sour sauce, taco sauce, soy sauce, horseradish sauce, honey sauce, barbecue sauce, chili sauce, condiments, namely, mustard, salsa, ketchup, mayonnaise, sweet relish, malt vinegar | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 17, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 4, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2017 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2016 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 7, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 21, 2016 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 25, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 2, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2015 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 21, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 2, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2015 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 13, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 9, 2015 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2015 | CEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2015 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 19, 2015 | EPEN | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2015 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2015 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2015 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2015 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2015 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2014 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 25, 2014 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |