USPTO serial 76716686
Serial No. 76716686
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TWOHIG, SHANNON MARIE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 76716686?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Long sleeve t-shirts; short sleeve t-shirts; sleeveless t-shirts, Tank Tops, Hooded Sweat shirts, Sweat pants, Workout shorts, Workout pants, Baseball Caps, Beanie caps, Sports Bra's, Jogging suits, Jackets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2017 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2017 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 20, 2017 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 17, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 14, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 14, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 18, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 15, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 20, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 30, 2015 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 14, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 10, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 10, 2015 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2015 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 18, 2015 | RDX2 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2015 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2015 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 11, 2015 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| May 19, 2015 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 28, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2015 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 5, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 20, 2015 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2014 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |