USPTO serial 76716810
FABRIC FIRE GARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODSAID, IRA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FABRIC FIRE GARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher John Rudy
209 HURON AVE STE 8PORT HURON, MI 48060-3860UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Water-based fire retardant compositions for commercial and domestic use on fabrics, textiles, cloth, paper, wood and other porous materials such as on or in couches, mattresses, carpets, drapes, camping equipment, homes, autos, boats, and recreational vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2018 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 16, 2018 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 16, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 1, 2017 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2017 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Aug 16, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 7, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 31, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 24, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 6, 2017 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 20, 2016 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 6, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 29, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 15, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 6, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 2, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 1, 2015 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 15, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |