USPTO serial 76717018
LACE LIDZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRADLEY, EVELYN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LACE LIDZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Mississauga, Ontario, CA
Mississauga, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT A. VANDERHYE
ROBERT A VANDERHYE801 RIDGE DRMCLEAN, VA 22101-1625UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Headwear, namely, caps | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2019 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 16, 2019 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 16, 2019 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 16, 2019 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 16, 2016 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 3, 2016 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 22, 2016 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 31, 2016 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 30, 2016 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 4, 2016 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 4, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2016 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 5, 2016 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 29, 2015 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 14, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |