Drawing for INVISIONHEART

USPTO serial 76717045

INVISIONHEART

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NOBLE, ANNIE MELISSA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INVISIONHEART?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward D. Lanquist, Jr.

1600 DIVISION ST STE 500NASHVILLE, TN 37203-2774UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Mobile hardware, namely, 12 Lead ECG, and downloadable cloud software for ECG data management system, and patient electronic medical records for review of patient data; Mobile computing and operating platforms consisting of data transceivers, wireless networks and gateways for collection, management, and review of cardiac dataACTIVE—
010Mobile hardware, namely, 12 Lead ECG, and downloadable cloud software for ECG data management wherein ECGs and patient data can be uploaded, archived, retrieved, and edited, both sold together as integral components of electrocardiographic recordersACTIVE—
042Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for access and annotation of patient ECG tracing records by physicians, nurses, technicians, and billing specialists and for use in providing alerts and push notifications to mobile devicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 29, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 29, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 28, 2015NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 2, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 13, 2015NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 24, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 23, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 23, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 23, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 23, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 26, 2015ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 26, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 25, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 17, 2015MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 24, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 20, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance