USPTO serial 76717306
36/86
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with 36/86?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward D. Lanquist, Jr.
Edward D. Lanquist, Jr. Waddey Patterson1600 Division St Ste 500Nashville, TN 37203-2774UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing business services in the nature of business consulting services, business advisory services, business assistance services, and business information services in the field of business organization and business strategies, namely, branding, business research, product development, management, marketing, growth, development, strategic planning, business solutions strategies | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Venture capital services | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, conducting classes, seminars, conferences, and workshops in the fields of business organization, business management, business strategic planning, business solutions, business marketing, business training, business growth strategies, business development, business talent training and management; and distribution of course and educational materials in connection therewith | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Launch Tennessee
- Other trademarks owned by Launch Tennessee
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named 36/86
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 5, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 29, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 5, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2016 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 4, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 7, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 4, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2015 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 9, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 20, 2015 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 5, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 5, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 30, 2015 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 24, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 27, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |