USPTO serial 76717503
DRONEVIEW IMAGING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4902941Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 16, 2016
- Examiner
- PERKINS, ELLEN J
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DRONEVIEW IMAGING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James W. Armstrong
James W. Armstrong Sacks Tierney4250 N Drinkwater Blvd Fl 4Scottsdale, AZ 85251-3693UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Capturing, editing and producing photos and videos using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) with on-board digital video cameras, multispectral cameras, or thermal cameras; aerial photography; aerial videography; photography services; videography services; video recording services; video editing services; and video production services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 26, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2022 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 23, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 16, 2016 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 12, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 5, 2016 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 5, 2016 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2015 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2015 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2015 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2015 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 10, 2015 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 11, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | FFDM | FILING RECEIPT CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |