USPTO serial 76717643
NETVELOCITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NETVELOCITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ELLEN R. LOKKER
ELLEN R. LOKKER Lokker Law Plc11876 Sunrise Valley Dr Ste 201Reston, VA 20191-3328UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | MULTI-PLATFORM MOBILE APPLICATION THAT PROVIDES PROACTIVE NETWORK MANAGEMENT AND MONITORING SOLUTIONS USING THE POWER OF SOCIAL NETWORKING TO COMPARE THE CONSUMER'S CARRIER PERFORMANCE WITH THAT OF FRIENDS AND FAMILY. IT SUPPORTS MULTIPLE ACCESS TECHNOLOGIES INCLUDING CDMA, GSM, UMTS, HSPA AND LTE, PROVIDING INSIGHTS TO CARRIER COVERAGE AND QUALITY METRICS. THE PLATFORM PROVIDES A CHANNEL OF COMMUNICATION BETWEEN CONSUMER AND MOBILE SERVICE PROVIDERS FOR FEEDBACK AND NETWORK RELATED NEWS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 8, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 10, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |