USPTO serial 76717779
OCTAGON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRISCH, HANNA CHO
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OCTAGON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Antonio, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kirby B. Drake
Kirby B. Drake Klemchuk LLP8150 North Central Expy, 10th FloorDallas, TX 75206UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | STREAMING OF AUDIOVISUAL AND MULTIMEDIA CONTENT, NAMELY, TRAVEL DOCUMENTARY ACCOUNTS OF TOURS IN THE NATION OF ISRAEL, VIA THE INTERNET; TRANSMISSION AND DELIVERY OF AUDIOVISUAL AND MULTIMEDIA CONTENT, NAMELY, TRAVEL DOCUMENTARY ACCOUNTS OF TOURS IN THE NATION OF ISRAEL, VIA THE INTERNET; VIDEO-ON-DEMAND TRANSMISSION SERVICES FEATURING TRAVEL DOCUMENTARY ACCOUNTS OF TOURS IN THE NATION OF ISRAEL | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2016 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Oct 18, 2016 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2016 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 17, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 9, 2016 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 27, 2016 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 6, 2016 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |