USPTO serial 76717954
CHAINSAW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4990767Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 5, 2016
- Examiner
- LAM, HAI-LY HUYNH
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CHAINSAW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CLARITY CONSULTING CORPORATION
SPRING, TX
Sinking Spring, PA
Sinking Spring, PA
Sinking Spring, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gladys E. Wiles
Gladys E. Wiles Snyder & Wiles Pc7731 Main StFogelsville, PA 18051-1600UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 045 | Consulting services in the field of maintaining the security and integrity of information systems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CLARITY CONSULTING CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by White Badger Group, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by White Badger Group, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by White Badger Group, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named CHAINSAW
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2023 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 19, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 30, 2016 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 14, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2016 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 27, 2016 | RDX2 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2016 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2016 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 24, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 8, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 8, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 20, 2015 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 14, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |