USPTO serial 76717955
MULTI-FACTOR DEFENSE FRAMEWORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4966455Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 24, 2016
- Examiner
- LAM, HAI-LY HUYNH
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MULTI-FACTOR DEFENSE FRAMEWORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gladys E. Wiles
Gladys E. Wiles Snyder & Wiles PC7731 Main StreetFogelsville, PA 1 8051UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 045 | consulting services in the field of information security, namely, in the field of maintaining the security and integrity of information databases | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CLARITY CONSULTING CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by White Badger Group, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by White Badger Group, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named MULTI-FACTOR DEFENSE FRAMEWORK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2022 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 24, 2016 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 18, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 10, 2016 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 25, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 22, 2016 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Mar 5, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 4, 2016 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2016 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2015 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 26, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 18, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |