USPTO serial 76718383
SMARTGLOVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SMARTGLOVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
ONTARIO, L0L 2L0, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert G. Roomian
P.O. Box 7111Alexandria, VA 22307UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Baseball gloves, Bicycle gloves, Diving gloves, Golf gloves, Household gloves for general use, Hockey gloves, Leather gloves, Ski gloves, Softball gloves, Sport gloves, Water ski gloves, Winter gloves, Work gloves | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 15, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 16, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2015 | FFDM | FILING RECEIPT CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | FFDM | FILING RECEIPT CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 1, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |