USPTO serial 76718477
ANGRY-MAMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPARACINO, MARK V
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ANGRY-MAMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DUNCANSVILLE, PA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Oven cleaners, namely, dispensers for disinfectants and cleaning solutions via spraying | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2017 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Feb 15, 2017 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2016 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 26, 2016 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 21, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 21, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 31, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 31, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2015 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |