USPTO serial 76718790
SENTINEL INNOVATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SENTINEL INNOVATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward D. Lanquist, Jr.
Edward D. Lanquist, Jr. PATTERSON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW, P.C.1600 Division StreetSuite 500Nashville, TN 37203Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software relating to education and delivery of educational services, namely, educational software featuring instruction in healthcare, nursing, business administration, and technology | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed educational materials in the field of healthcare, nursing, business administration, and technology | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | College consulting and counseling services, namely, assisting students in applying for scholarships and financial aid | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educating at universities or colleges; Providing live and on-line continuing education classes, forums, seminars, education simulations in the nature of role playing and case study, and webinars, all in the fields of business, information systems, technology, nursing, medical, and healthcare; Education services, namely, conducting distance learning instruction at the college and university level; College counseling services, namely, consultation on the availability of academic courses at universities and colleges; providing consultation in the availability of tutoring programs at universities and colleges; Education services, namely, providing tutoring in the fields of business, information systems, technology, nursing, medical, and healthcare; Career counseling, namely, providing advice concerning educational options to pursue career opportunities; Educational counseling services to assist students in planning and preparing for further education, namely, academic counseling | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software in the field of education for enabling users to remotely attend classes, to collaborate with classmates on assignments, to communicate with fellow students and course instructors, to conduct situational simulations, and to perform self-guided learning tasks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by American Sentinel University, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by American Sentinel University, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SENTINEL INNOVATION
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 4, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 31, 2017 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 6, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 16, 2016 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 2, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 18, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 22, 2016 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 12, 2016 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |