USPTO serial 76719094
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Chupa
John Chupa Law Offices of John Chupa and Associates, P.C.28535 Orchard Lake Rd. Suite 50Farmington Hills,, MI 48334UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail grocery store services; online retail grocery store services; wholesale food distributorship services featuring groceries; wholesale store services featuring groceries | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Restaurant services | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 044 | Food production, namely, farming services in the field of fruits and vegetables | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 31, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 5, 2016 | CEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 1, 2016 | EPEN | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY | — |
| Jun 22, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |