Drawing for GARDEN PARTY

USPTO serial 76719200

GARDEN PARTY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAM, HAI-LY HUYNH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GARDEN PARTY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward D. Lanquist, Jr

Edward D. Lanquist, Jr PATTERSON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW, P.C.1600 Division Street, Suite 500Nashville, TN 37203UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Ultrasonic animal repeller, namely, an ultrasonic sound and noise generator for animal repellantACTIVE—
028A sound and noise generator for animal attractant, namely, electronic hunting game calls; A sound and noise generator for animal repellant and attractant for hunting purposesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 1, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 1, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 4, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Nov 30, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 30, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 30, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 31, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
May 29, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 29, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 29, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 9, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Sep 7, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 7, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 7, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 30, 2017NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 4, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 15, 2017NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 28, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 21, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 6, 2017ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 6, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 2, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 18, 2017MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 19, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 14, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance