USPTO serial 76719786
LA RURAL ARGENTINE STEAK HOUSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRIFFIN, JAMES
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LA RURAL ARGENTINE STEAK HOUSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank L. Kubler,
Frank L. Kubler, Oltman, Flynn & Kubler915 Middle River Dr Ste 415Fort Lauderdale, FL 33304-3561UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | chimichurri and alfajores | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | retail store services and online retail store services featuring baking products, namely, flour, AS WELL AS candles, cookies, desserts, namely, alfajores, chocolates, coffee, yerba mate (tea), creamers, beverages, namely, water and tea, condiments, namely, salt and oregano, oil, vinegar, dining ware, jelly, namely, dulce de leche, hazelnut cocoa spread, jelly, dulce de leche, rice, pasta, sauces, soups, charcoal, insulated bottles, and mate (Argentine tea) | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by La Rural Corp
- Other trademarks owned by La Rural Corp
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named LA RURAL ARGENTINE STEAK HOUSE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 24, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 15, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2019 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 26, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2019 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 25, 2019 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 26, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 22, 2019 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2019 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 27, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 7, 2018 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 22, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 22, 2018 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2018 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jul 6, 2018 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 5, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2018 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 5, 2018 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2018 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2018 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2018 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Apr 2, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 2, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 18, 2017 | UNDR | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 31, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 9, 2017 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 10, 2017 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2017 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 8, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |