USPTO serial 76720198
LITTLE STARS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BURNS, ELLEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LITTLE STARS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
L5G 4P3 Mississauga Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTOPHER H. KOZLOWSKI
CHRISTOPHER H. KOZLOWSKI Kozlowski & Company5065 Forest Hill DriveL5M 5A7 Mississauga, Ontario,CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | Fresh Apples | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 13, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 2, 2019 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 1, 2019 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2019 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2019 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2019 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 8, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2018 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2018 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2018 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 19, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2017 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |