USPTO serial 76720558
SEI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NUNLEY, CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SEI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTOPHER JOHN RUDY
209 HURON AVENUE, SUITE 8PORT HURON, MI 48060UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing scientific and industrial research and analysis services, namely, providing research, analysis and reports of amounts of sulphur as emissions as a vapor from a sample, a liquid sample, an oleaginous sample, and a motor oil; and consulting services for scientific and industrial research and analysis services, namely, providing consulting in selection and operation of scientific instrumentation for providing analysis and reports of amounts of sulphur emissions as a vapor from a sample, a liquid sample, an oleaginous sample, and a motor oil | ACTIVE | Jun 14, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2020 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 18, 2020 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 18, 2020 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 3, 2020 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 17, 2020 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Jul 20, 2020 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2020 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 19, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 24, 2020 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2020 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 11, 2020 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 11, 2020 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2020 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 9, 2019 | RDX2 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2019 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2019 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2019 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 10, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 15, 2019 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 7, 2019 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |