USPTO serial 76720825
MICRO CLEAN PIXEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VALLILLO, MELISSA C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MICRO CLEAN PIXEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alexander J.A. Garcia
Alexander J.A. Garcia PERKINS COIE LLPP.O. Box 2608Seattle, WA 98111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Light emitting diodes; diodes; LED element being light emitting diode for use in the manufacture of data communication devices, electronic apparatus and equipment, screens and displays; LED module comprising light emitting diodes for use in the manufacture of data communication devices, electronic apparatus and equipment, screens and displays; semi-conductors; photo-semiconductors; diode arrays comprising light emitting diodes; LED backlight unit comprising light emitting diodes for use in manufacture of screens and displays; LED package composed of light emitting diodes, wire, frames, housing and lens sold as a unit; semiconductor luminous element packages comprising light emitting diodes for use in the manufacture of data communication devices, electronic apparatus and equipment, screens and displays; light sensors; LED displays; photoresistor; semiconductor power elements | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | LED luminaires; Light-emitting diode (LED) luminaires; LED landscape lights; LED scenery lamps; LED factory lights; LED lanterns for lighting; light emitting diodes (LED) lamps; LED sign lighting lamps; portable LED lanterns for lighting; LED chandelier; LED lamps also featuring sensors; LED spotlights; LED outdoor lamps; light emitting diode (LED) light bulbs; LED lighting equipment comprising light bulbs; LED ceiling lights; street lamps; LED lamps for ships | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 5, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 5, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 20, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2021 | TRPT | REQUEST FOR TRANSFORMATION PROCESSED - TOTAL | — |
| Dec 13, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |