USPTO serial 76975031
PRO-LINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2727099Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 17, 2003
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PRO-LINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jordan A. LaVine
Jordan A. LaVine Flaster/Greenberg, P.C.1628 John F. Kennedy Blvd., 15th FloorPhiladelphia, PA 19103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | printed publications, namely directories in the field of law, business and finance | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NLP IP Company
- Other trademarks owned by NLP IP Company
- Other trademarks owned by NLP IP Company
- Other trademarks owned by ALM PROPERTIES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named PRO-LINK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2011 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 23, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 10, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 25, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 5, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 19, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 29, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |