USPTO serial 76975177
WIRESTONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2747053Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 5, 2003
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WIRESTONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
EMERYVILLE, CA
EMERYVILLE, CA
EMERYVILLE, CA
EMERYVILLE, CA
Costa Mesa, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PETER G. MACK,
PETER G MACK, FOLEY & LARDNER LLP3000 K ST NW STE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20007UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business marketing consulting services; business consulting services in the field of marketing communications, marketing research, public relation services, providing business techniques relating to e-commerce and the global computer network and computer technology integration and architecture services related thereto; advertising agency services; preparing audio-visual presentations for use in advertising | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 2000 |
| 041 | Videotape, CD-ROM, and DVD production services; online computer education training regarding the use of customized software applications | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 2000 |
| 042 | Website design and development services; design of multimedia software recorded on CD-ROM for marketing, advertising, training and communication purposes; custom design of computer software in multiple fields for others; computer software design consultation | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WIRESTONE ACQUISITION, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by WIRESTONE, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by WIRESTONE, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by WIRESTONE, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Karl, Allan F.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named WIRESTONE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2006 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 13, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 23, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 3, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |