USPTO serial 76975359
JOSEPH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2897939Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 26, 2004
- Examiner
- AMOS, TANYA L
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with JOSEPH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MCLAREN VALE, State of SA, AU
MCLAREN VALE, State of SA, AU
Virginia, State of South Australia, AU
Virginia, State of South Australia, AU
Virginia, State of South Australia, AU
Virginia, State of South Australia, AU
PETER JOHN CANALA AND DAVIDE GRENCI AS TRUSTEES OF THE ESTATE OF THE LATE DINA GRILLI
MCLAREN VALE, AU
MCLAREN VALE, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph A. Sebolt
Joseph A. Sebolt SAND & SEBOLT4940 Munson Street NWAegis Tower, Suite 1100CANTON, OH 44718-3615Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | [ EDIBLE OILS AND FATS,] OLIVE OIL [, COOKING OIL, PRESERVED, DRIED AND COOKED FRUITS AND VEGETABLES ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 2, 2000 |
| 033 | ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NAMELY, [ CHAMPAGNE, COGNAC, COOKING WINE, GIN, DISTILLED LIQUOR, OUZO, SANGRIA, SCHNAPPS, SHERRY, VERMOUTH, WHISKEY, VODKA, RUM,] WINES [, FORTIFIED WINES ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GRILLI, JOSEPH
- Other trademarks owned by GRILLI, DINA
- Other trademarks owned by GRILLI, DINA
- Other trademarks owned by GRILLI, DINA
- Other trademarks owned by GRILLI, JOSEPH
- Other trademarks owned by GRILLI, JOSEPH
- Other trademarks owned by PETER JOHN CANALA AND DAVIDE GRENCI AS TRUSTEES OF THE ESTATE OF THE LATE DINA GRILLI
- Other trademarks owned by GRILLI, JOSEPH
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named JOSEPH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2025 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 26, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 12, 2014 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 12, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 23, 2014 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 30, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 2, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 19, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 3, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 3, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 11, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 22, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 22, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |