Drawing for CAFE VOYAGE

USPTO serial 76975503

CAFE VOYAGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHOINIERE, MONIQUE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CAFE VOYAGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HERBERT DUBNO

HERBERT DUBNO THE FIRM OF KARL F. ROSS, PC5676 RIVERDALE AVE BOX 900BRONX, NY 10471-0900UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036TRAVEL AGENCY SERVICES, NAMELY, ISSUING TRAVELER'S CHECKSACTIVE—
038Communications services, namely, transmitting streamed sound and audio-visual recording via the Internet; electronic transmission of message and data, telecommunication services, namely, providing multiple user access to the InternetACTIVE—
039Arranging for travel visas, passports and travel documents for persons traveling abroad; arranging travel tours; arranging tours as a bonus program for credit card customers; making reservations and bookings for transportation; travel booking agencies; travel clubs; travel guide services; travel information servicesACTIVE—
042Restaurant services, bar services, self-service restaurants, hotel services; travel agency services, namely making reservations and bookings for temporary lodgingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 15, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 15, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 8, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 8, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 8, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 7, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 1, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 1, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 23, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 9, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 4, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 4, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 9, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 16, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 27, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 30, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 6, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 6, 2003DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 7, 2003DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 25, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 25, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 25, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 11, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance