USPTO serial 76975657
MIRAVIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 23, 2003
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MIRAVIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter Kunin
Peter Kunin DOWNS RACHLIN MARTIN PLLC199 MAIN STREET, P.O. BOX 190BURLINGTON, VT 05402-0190UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Line of books in the field of education, namely, books for educating professional educators and school administrators with respect to instructional techniques, instructional strategies and instructional tools | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 1, 2000 |
| 041 | Education, training and information services, namely, conducting and arranging seminars, workshops, conferences and training sessions for professional educators and school administrators in the field of education, namely, instructional techniques, instructional strategies and instructional tools | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 2000 |
| 042 | Consulting services for professional educators and school administrators, in the field of education, namely, instructional techniques, instructional strategies and instructional tools | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MIRAVIA, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by MiraVia LLC
- Other trademarks owned by MiraVia LLC
- Other trademarks owned by MiraVia LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MIRAVIA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2024 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 23, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 23, 2013 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 19, 2013 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2013 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 19, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 8, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 8, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 14, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 19, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 30, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |