Drawing for RELIANT PARK

USPTO serial 76975701

RELIANT PARK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COFIELD, JULIA
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RELIANT PARK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robin Lightner Maisashvili

ROBIN LIGHTNER MAISASHVILI BAKER BOTTS910 LOUISIANA STHOUSTON, TX 77002-4916UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038computer services, namely, providing an on-line bulletin board in the fields of entertainment and sports and chat roomsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 7, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 7, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 27, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 15, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 23, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 3, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 3, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 28, 2003DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 21, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 12, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 2, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 28, 2001DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 14, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 8, 2001ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 17, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance