Drawing for BOOST

USPTO serial 76975774

BOOST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DAWE III, WILLIAM H
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BOOST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Travis P. Boozer

TRAVIS P BOOZER KSOPHT0101-Z21006391 SPRINT PKWYOVERLAND PARK, KS 66251-2060UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Games, namely, board games and card games; playthings, namely, hand held units for playing electronic games; sporting articles, namely, surfboards, skateboards, snowboards, wakeboards, bodyboards and skimboardsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 12, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 12, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 21, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 21, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 6, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 3, 2006REINREINSTATED—
Apr 24, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 24, 2006EXDMEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT—
Mar 24, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 24, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 24, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 23, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 22, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 25, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 25, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 16, 2003DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 17, 2003DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance