Drawing for MONARC

USPTO serial 76975823

MONARC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GILBERT, REBECCA L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MONARC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Apolzon

LAWRENCE E APOLZON FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009musical sound recordings and downloadable musical sound recordings none of the foregoing emanating from a casino or resort with the same nameABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 13, 2004ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Aug 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 9, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 26, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 26, 2004IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Apr 5, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 5, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2003EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2003AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 28, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 30, 2003DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 19, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 17, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 27, 2003DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
May 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 30, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 5, 2002AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Aug 5, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 5, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance