USPTO serial 76975863
AP POPLEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEATING, MICHAEL P
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AP POPLEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark B. Harrison
MARK B HARRISON VENABLE, BAETJER, HOWARD & CIVILETTI, LLPO BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-9998UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Soaps, perfumes, essential oils for personal use, cosmetics, hair lotions; dentifrices | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Stationery and pens | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Trunks and travelling bags; umbrellas, parasols and walking sticks; whips, harness and saddlery; briefcase type portfolios, briefcases, pilot cases, attache cases, travel bags, suitcases, garment bags for travel, toiletry cases sold empty, leather shopping bags, wallets, billfolds, change purses, purses, credit card cases, handbags and key cases | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Popley, Rajesh Ramchand
- Other trademarks owned by Popley, Rajesh Ramchand
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Similar marks named AP POPLEY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 2, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 13, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 28, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 6, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 16, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 3, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | 44ED | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 30, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 1, 2003 | 44EA | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Jul 1, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |