USPTO serial 76975891
EXPERT GARDENER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KLINE, MATTHEW
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EXPERT GARDENER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Insecticides, pesticides, rodenticides, fungicides and insect repellents for domestic use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 10, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 8, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 14, 2004 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |