USPTO serial 76975899
Serial No. 76975899
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2799040Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 23, 2003
- Examiner
- WEIMER, CAROLINE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with Serial No. 76975899?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA
South San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David E. Sipiora
David E. Sipiora Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP1400 Wewatta Street, Suite 600Denver, CO 80202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | MICROFLUIDIC DEVICES, NAMELY, MICROFLUIDIC PUMPS FOR USE IN NON-BIOTECHNOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, SUCH AS BATTERIES, OPTICAL SWITCHES AND IN OTHER AREAS MOVEMENT IS ON A MICROSCALE; MICROFLUIDIC DEVICES, NAMELY, MICROFLUIDIC PUMPS FOR USE IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY AND OTHER SCIENTIFIC FIELDS WHERE MOLECULAR OR CELL SEPARATION IS DESIRABLE OR MOVEMENT OF GASES OR LIQUIDS ON A MICROSCALE IS NEEDED | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 30, 2001 |
| 009 | MICROFLUIDIC DEVICES, NAMELY, MICROFLUIDIC DEFLECTABLE VALVES AND OPERATING SOFTWARE FOR USE IN NON-BIOTECHNOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, SUCH AS BATTERIES, OPTICAL SWITCHES, AND IN OTHER AREAS MOVEMENT IS ON A MICROSCALE; MICROFLUIDIC INSTRUMENTATION, NAMELY, FLUID CONTROLLERS; MICROFLUIDIC DEVICES, NAMELY, MICROFLUIDIC DEFLECTABLE VALVES AND OPERATING SOFTWARE FOR USE IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY AND OTHER SCIENTIFIC FIELDS WHERE MOLECULAR OR CELL SEPARATION IS DESIRABLE OR MOVEMENT OF GASES OR LIQUIDS ON A MICROSCALE IS NEEDED | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 30, 2001 |
| 010 | MICROFLUIDIC DEVICES, NAMELY, MICROFLUIDIC FLOW CONTROLS FOR MEDICAL AND SURGICAL PROCEDURES, AND IN OTHER MEDICAL FIELDS WHERE MOLECULAR OR CELL SEPARATION IS DESIRABLE OR MOVEMENT OF GASES OR LIQUIDS ON A MICROSCALE IS NEEDED; BIOCHIPS WHICH EMPLOY MICROFLUIDIC PUMPS AND VALVES FOR MEDICAL USE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 30, 2001 |
| 035 | LICENSING OF MICROFLUIDIC CONTROLLERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 30, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FLUIDIGM CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by FLUIDIGM CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by FLUIDIGM CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Mycometrix Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2024 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 23, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2014 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2014 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 6, 2014 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 6, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 23, 2013 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2013 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 28, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 15, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 11, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 17, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |