USPTO serial 76976024
BERNARDO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPARACINO, MARK V
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BERNARDO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James W Dabney
JACQUELINE LESSER WHITE & CASE LLP1155 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, swimwear, lingerie, belts, ties and dresses | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 8, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 25, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 28, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 11, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 22, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |