Drawing for IPA-NIMA

USPTO serial 76976049

IPA-NIMA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALTREE, NICHOLAS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IPA-NIMA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paula J. Krasny, Esq.

PAULA J KRASNY ESQ BAKER & MCKENZIEONE PRUDENTIAL PLZ130 E RANDOLPH ST STE 3500CHICAGO, IL 60601-6314

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, bathrobes, belts, underwear, blazers, blouses, cardigans, coats, dresses, dressing gowns, dungarees, jackets, jeans, jumpers, miniskirts, pants, pantsuits, shirts, pullovers, robes, scarves, shawls, sweat shirts, shorts, skirts, slacks, sleepwear, suits, body suits, gym suits, sweat suits, sweaters, t-shirts, tops, tracksuits, trousers, turtlenecks, underwear, vests, waistcoats; headwearACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 21, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2004RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Sep 15, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 21, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 18, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 11, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2003DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 18, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 29, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 29, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 14, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 2, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance