USPTO serial 76976083
TRONIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRONIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
74172 Neckarsulm, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan P. Osha
JONATHAN P OSHA OSHA & MAY LLP1221 MCKINNEY ST STE 2800HOUSTON, TX 77010UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | TELEPHONES, FAX MACHINES, TELEPHONE ANSWERING MACHINES; POCKET CALCULATORS,PHOTOGRAPHIC AND OPTICAL APPARATUS, NAMELY DIGITAL, PHOTOGRAPHIC, MOTION PICTURE CAMERAS AND BINOCULARS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2004 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |