Drawing for KURITA

USPTO serial 76976084

KURITA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWN, BRIAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KURITA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark I. Peroff

MARK I PEROFF KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART NICHOLSON GRAHAM599 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-6030UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Motors and engines for the collection and transportation of refuse, driving motors for the collection and transportation of refuse, transmission shafts other than for land vehicles, grinding machines, mechanical discharging and charging hoppers, housings as parts of machines, crankcases for machines, motors and engines, hangers as parts of machines, elevators for machine use, jacks for machines, hydraulic motors and enginesACTIVE—
011Apparatus and devices for use with water in domestic and commercial applications, namely, bathtubs, bathtub enclosures, faucets, gauges, shower heads, showers, sinks; plumbing fittings, namely, valves, cocks; swimming pool water level adjustment systems comprising water gauges, manual and automatic control valves, pipes, fittings and hoses therefor; water watchers, namely, faucets having a dial-like water gauge to stop water gush; water switches, namely, faucets having a lever to regulate water gushACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 28, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 28, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 28, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 5, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 20, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 20, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 23, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 20, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 20, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 21, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 12, 2004ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jun 8, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 11, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 21, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 27, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 14, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 14, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2003DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 25, 2003DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 30, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 27, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 22, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 16, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 16, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2002UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance