USPTO serial 76976141
BSA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BSA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J GREGORY WHITEHAIR
J GREGORY WHITEHAIR GIBSON DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP1801 CALIFORNIA ST STE 4100DENVER, CO 80202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | motorcycles, small jet-propelled boats for recreational use, snowmobiles, all terrain vehicles, namely three and four wheel off road motorcycles, and replacement parts therefor | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2004 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 10, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 21, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 15, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 15, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 5, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 9, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |