USPTO serial 76976285
DEUTSCHE POST WORLD NET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2982378Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 2, 2005
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DEUTSCHE POST WORLD NET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elizabeth R. Gosse, Esq.
Anthony J. Malutta Townsend and Townsend and Crew LLPTwo Embarcadero Center, 8th FloorSan Francisco, CA 94111-3834UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Electronic exchange of information between data processing systems or by deposition in a data processing system that can be accessed by the recipient over a data transfer network and provides guaranteed delivery, status tracking and guaranteed security through digital encryption; electronic delivery of written messages, especially conversion of non-visual, electrically or electronically transferred or stored messages into visually readable and physical dispatches for letter mail delivery; electronic delivery of news and data including pictures via internet and online database in the area of news | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 20, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 20, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 18, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 17, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 16, 2004 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2004 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2001 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Dec 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |