USPTO serial 76976348
WHY BE NORMAL?
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WHY BE NORMAL??
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
12084 Mondovi' (Cuneo), IT
12084 Mondovi' (Cuneo), IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank P. Presta
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | PROVIDING TRAINING IN THE NATURE OF ORIGINAL TRAINING PROGRAMS, NAMELY, COURSES OF INSTRUCTION IN PHYSICAL EXERCISE FOR MEMBERS OF THE FITNESS INDUSTRY; EDUCATION IN THE NATURE OF MARKETING SEMINARS AND TRAINING COURSES FOR FITNESS PROFESSIONALS; ENTERTAINMENT IN THE NATURE OF COMMUNITY SPORTING EVENTS, NAMELY SPORTS CAR RACES, GOLF TOURNAMENTS, TRACK AND FIELDS COMPETITIONS, FITNESS CONVENTIONS AND SHOWS; ENTERTAINMENT IN THE NATURE OF COMMUNITY RECREATIONAL EVENTS, NAMELY ETHNIC FESTIVALS, MAGIC SHOWS, GYMNASTIC PERFORMANCES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 24, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 18, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 31, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 5, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 14, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 23, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 2, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |